Which One Should You Choose?
| Your Application | Recommended Alloy |
|---|---|
| High-velocity seawater (above 3.5 m/s) | C71500 |
| High-pressure or high-temperature systems | C71500 |
| Polluted or turbulent seawater | C71500 |
| Offshore oil & gas platforms | C71500 |
| Naval / military shipboard systems | C71500 |
| General marine piping, low to moderate velocity | C70600 |
| Cost-sensitive projects | C70600 |
| Desalination evaporator tubes | C70600 |
| Clean seawater, low turbulence | C70600 |

Chemical Composition – What's the Difference?
The main difference between C71500 and C70600 is nickel content.
| Element | C71500 (70/30) | C70600 (90/10) |
|---|---|---|
| Copper (Cu) | 68.9 – 72.0% (Balance) | 88.0 – 91.0% (Balance) |
| Nickel (Ni) | 29.0 – 33.0% | 9.0 – 11.0% |
| Iron (Fe) | 0.40 – 0.70% | 1.0 – 1.8% |
| Manganese (Mn) | 1.0% max | 0.50 – 1.0% |
| Lead (Pb) | 0.02% max | 0.05% max |
| Zinc (Zn) | 0.50% max | 1.0% max |
Nickel is the key element that provides corrosion resistance and strength. Higher nickel content means better performance in aggressive seawater, higher velocities, and higher temperatures.
Mechanical Properties
C71500 is significantly stronger than C70600.
| Property (Annealed Condition) | C71500 (70/30) | C70600 (90/10) |
|---|---|---|
| Tensile Strength (MPa) | 360 – 520 | 275 – 380 |
| Yield Strength (MPa) | 125 – 207 | 105 – 170 |
| Elongation (%) | 30 – 45 | 35 – 50 |
| Hardness (Rockwell B) | 60 – 90 | 45 – 75 |
C71500 can handle higher pressure and higher mechanical loads
C70600 is more ductile and easier to form (bending, flaring, expanding)
Both alloys have good ductility, but C70600 is more forgiving during fabrication
Physical Properties
| Property | C71500 (70/30) | C70600 (90/10) |
|---|---|---|
| Density (g/cm³) | 8.94 – 8.95 | 8.94 |
| Thermal Conductivity (W/m·K) | 29 | 40 – 46 |
| Electrical Conductivity (% IACS) | 4 – 5 | 9 – 10 |
| Melting Point (°C) | 1170 – 1240 | 1100 – 1150 |
| Max Continuous Operating Temp (°C) | 350 | 260 – 300 |
C70600 has better heat transfer (higher thermal conductivity) – better for heat exchangers
C71500 can operate at higher temperatures – suitable for steam condensers and high-temperature heat exchangers
Density is nearly identical – weight calculations are similar for both alloys
Corrosion Resistance
Both alloys offer excellent seawater corrosion resistance. But C71500 performs better in demanding conditions.
| Environment | C71500 (70/30) | C70600 (90/10) |
|---|---|---|
| Clean seawater, low velocity | Excellent | Excellent |
| Clean seawater, high velocity (>3.5 m/s) | Superior | Acceptable (limited to ~3.5 m/s) |
| Polluted or stagnant seawater | Superior | Good |
| High temperature seawater | Superior | Good |
| Chloride stress corrosion cracking resistance | Excellent | Excellent |
| Biofouling resistance | Very good | Excellent |
| Erosion / impingement resistance | Superior | Good |
Fabrication
| Fabrication Property | C71500 (70/30) | C70600 (90/10) |
|---|---|---|
| Cold bending formability | Good (needs larger bend radius) | Excellent (smaller bend radius possible) |
| Weldability | Excellent | Very good |
| Machinability rating | 20% | 20% |
| Stress relief annealing after bending | Highly recommended | Optional |
| Hot working | Good | Good |
C70600 is easier to bend – better for tight spaces and field bending
C71500 has better weldability due to higher nickel content
For C71500 cold bending, stress relief annealing is strongly recommended to prevent future stress corrosion cracking
Cost Comparison
C71500 is typically 25-40% more expensive than C70600.
| Cost Factor | C71500 (70/30) | C70600 (90/10) |
|---|---|---|
| Raw material cost | High (30% nickel) | Lower (10% nickel) |
| Processing cost | Higher (more difficult to work) | Standard |
| Packaging cost | Similar | Similar |
| Total material cost | 25-40% higher | Baseline |
Is the higher cost worth it?
For high-velocity, high-pressure, or high-temperature seawater systems – YES
For general marine piping with moderate conditions – NO, C70600 is sufficient
Applications
C71500 (70/30) Applications:
High-velocity seawater piping systems (>3.5 m/s)
Power plant condensers (steam side, high temperature)
Offshore oil & gas platform risers and leg sheathing
Naval / military shipboard systems
High-pressure heat exchangers
Desalination brine heaters
Applications requiring maximum corrosion resistance
C70600 (90/10) Applications:
General marine seawater piping (≤3.5 m/s)
Shipboard cooling, ballast, and firewater systems
Desalination evaporator tubes
Heat exchanger tubes (moderate conditions)
HVAC and refrigeration systems
Brake lines and hydraulic tubing
General industrial applications
C71500 vs C70600 at a Glance
| Factor | C71500 (70/30) | C70600 (90/10) |
|---|---|---|
| Nickel content | 29-33% | 9-11% |
| Tensile strength | 360-520 MPa | 275-380 MPa |
| Yield strength | 125-207 MPa | 105-170 MPa |
| Elongation | 30-45% | 35-50% |
| Thermal conductivity | 29 W/m·K | 40-46 W/m·K |
| Max operating temp | 350°C | 260-300°C |
| High-velocity seawater (>3.5 m/s) | Best | Not recommended |
| Biofouling resistance | Very good | Excellent |
| Cold bending formability | Good | Excellent |
| Weldability | Excellent | Very good |
| Relative cost | +25-40% | Baseline |
| Best for | Critical, demanding systems | General marine, cost-sensitive |
FAQ
Q1: C71500 vs C70600 – which one is stronger?
C71500 is significantly stronger. Tensile strength of C71500 is 360-520 MPa vs C70600 at 275-380 MPa. Yield strength is 125-207 MPa vs 105-170 MPa. For high-pressure systems, choose C71500.
Q2: Which alloy has better corrosion resistance in seawater?
Both are excellent, but C71500 performs better in high-velocity, high-temperature, or polluted seawater. C71500 contains 30% nickel vs 10% in C70600. The higher nickel content provides superior erosion and impingement resistance. For clean seawater at low to moderate velocity, C70600 is sufficient.
Q3: Which alloy is more economical?
C70600 is more economical, typically 25-40% less expensive than C71500. C70600 contains only 10% nickel (vs 30% in C71500). For general marine piping, moderate conditions, and cost-sensitive projects, choose C70600. For critical, demanding systems where reliability is paramount, the higher cost of C71500 is justified.
Q4: Can C71500 and C70600 be welded together?
Yes, they can be welded together using ERNi-7 or AWS A5.7 Class ERCuNi filler metal. However, the weld zone will have properties between the two alloys. For critical applications, consult a welding engineer. For general use, direct welding is acceptable.
Q5: Which alloy is easier to bend for field fabrication?
C70600 is easier to bend. C70600 has higher ductility (35-50% elongation) and lower yield strength, allowing smaller bend radii without cracking. C71500 requires larger bend radii and benefits from stress relief annealing after bending. For tight space constraints, choose C70600.
Q6: Which alloy has better biofouling resistance?
C70600 is recognized for excellent biofouling resistance. The 90/10 alloy naturally resists marine organism attachment. C71500 also resists biofouling but C70600 is often preferred for seawater intake lines, ship hulls, and other applications where marine growth is a primary concern.
Q7: Which alloy is better for high-temperature service?
C71500 is better for high-temperature service. C71500 has a maximum continuous operating temperature of 350°C (662°F) vs C70600 at 260-300°C. For power plant condensers, steam systems, and high-temperature heat exchangers, choose C71500.
Q8: Do both alloys meet the same ASTM standards?
Yes, both are covered by ASTM B111 (seamless condenser tubes), ASTM B466 (seamless pipe), ASTM B151 (rod and bar), and ASTM B171 (plate and sheet). C70600 is UNS C70600; C71500 is UNS C71500. Both are available to ASME specifications (SB111, SB466, etc.) for pressure vessel applications.
Q9: Is C71500 worth the extra cost for my project?
It depends on your operating conditions. Choose C71500 if: seawater velocity exceeds 3.5 m/s, operating temperature exceeds 260°C, system pressure is high, or reliability is mission-critical. Choose C70600 if: conditions are moderate, cost is the primary driver, or biofouling resistance is the main concern.
Q10: How do I get a quote for C71500 or C70600 pipe?
Contact us with your specifications: OD, wall thickness, length, quantity, temper (annealed or drawn), and destination. We will provide a competitive quote with full material traceability and EN 10204 3.1 certification. For large projects, we can also provide third-party inspection and project-specific documentation.
Choose C71500 when
High-velocity seawater (above 3.5 m/s)
High pressure or high temperature
Polluted or turbulent seawater
Maximum corrosion and erosion resistance required
Reliability is mission-critical (naval, offshore, power generation)
Choose C70600 when
Moderate seawater velocity (below 3.5 m/s)
Cost is a primary constraint
Biofouling resistance is the main concern
General marine piping, desalination, or HVAC applications




